![]() There's more to it than buying squeaky-clean samples. ? (Or are you even sometimes happy to go completely non-representational?) Do you prefer photo-realism, an impressionistic watercolour, a line drawing. Even more so for music constructed from samples. ![]() They don't sound impressive enough in demonstration. Manufacturers are reluctant to market "dry" samples. Or you may decide they add some special magic. You may decide the effect of different microphone positions is exactly the same as would be achieved by adding different amounts of artificial reverb. > Is then the 3 mic position advantage of platinum more of a consideration? Does the sound set for platinum from The Sound set Project make use of them? > Then I remembered, are not commercial CDs 16 bits? In which case is 24 bits really a big consideration? > "You might find it hard to discern any difference in quality between 16 and 24 bits" ![]() Re: EWQLSO Difference between Silver, Gold, Platinum and Platinum Plus ![]() Is this correct or am I missing something? All comments welcome. But if this is the only reason I could just use Sibelius Sounds while composing and use Platinum for the demo and save myself some money. The only possibility I can think of is, if due to lack of computer resources and therefore slowness in loading, I might want to use the 16 bit samples while composing and only the 24 bit samples for producing a demo. Now, what I'm struggling to understand is why I might want this. Full set of articulations both at 16 and 24 bits. Now for the bit I'm really interested in.Ĥ) Platinum Plus. Please comment if I've got it wrong so far. Therefore better quality (more computer resources needed) Full set of articulations, 16 bitģ) Platinum. I just wanted to bounce off some people with more knowledge than me my understanding of the difference between the various flavours" of EWQLSO.ġ) Silver.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |